Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. That’s why we must have debate and dialogue about psy-ops.
If one is connecting dots about psy-ops running between “Booze Allen Hamilton…Snowden…Wikileaks…the Hastings “assassination” , wikileaker holed up in Ecuadorean Embaprison, to Chelsea the transgender whistleblower/traitor/NY Times OpEd writer from Ft Leavenworth prison, to Snowden hiding in Russia”, one ought to be able to conjugate that with a lot more research, and then let it have some air and expose it to the world.
A psy-op isn’t proven because someone went to the same school as the children of someone else.
I went to the same school as Cleveland Earl Dodge III. We spent time together at his family summer home in the Thousand Islands. If you research Cleveland Earl Dodge and his son Cleveland Earl Dodge Jr., you will learn a lot. I also went to school with the two children of James McGregor Burns, in a town where one of the ministers was a well-known member of one of those Yale fraternities; maybe it was Skull and Bones. I lived under the shadow of the 1,800-acre animal husbandry plantation belonging to Mrs. and Mrs. E. Parmalee Prentice.
Does this mean that I was taken in and tucked under the wing of the Rockefeller family or the Central Intelligence Agency and secretly “baked” in such a way that I would emerge in my 60’s to become a blogger whose aim was to mislead after I’d retired and had a heart attack and stroke under the watchful gaze of the Rockefeller influence in West Virginia?
It might be. From this, someone might conclude that I’ve been a sleeper for decades. Did you known I went to the same prep school as Valerie Jarrett?
Does this mean anything? No.
It means that my parents, who were as snookered and confused as anyone and who were subject to or immersed in the beliefs of the day. found their way to a certain location and they had kids and the kids went along and they thought one of the kids should have the benefits of a decent education and so my step-mother took a job at the school as a secretary so they could afford the tuition.
My classmates were children of industrial wealth. Does this mean that I subscribed to and embraced their world-view? It must be that I am living in an apartment on a Social Security stipend and not in a mansion in the hills living off my investments as part of my “cover”.
Has there been substantive debate and independent confirmation? People have to be able to engage and converse with some transparency and to have their feet kept to the fire in terms of how they see things. How any one person sees something different is entirely possible. We can’t possible put in a few short paragraphs all the hard and soft input that comes from our reading online and offline, as well as our interpersonal interactions offline, as well as our education, work experience, etc. All those go in to making up perception. …
This is why ongoing, constructive and focused dialogue among bloggers is valuable.
One of the more inspiring things I ever read was from the late great Gabriel Marquez Garcia who spoke of tertuliana among journalists:
“… every afternoon at 5pm, the entire newspaper met for an unofficial coffee break somewhere in the newsroom, and took a breather from the daily tensions. It was an open discussion where we reviewed the hot themes of the day in each section of the newspaper and gave the final touches to the next day’s edition.”
‘… the Basie’s band was swinging
‘Cause that’s something else you know
They know how to play it, they know how to say it
They just wind it up and let it go….’
US GOVERNMENTS ARGUMENT AGAINST BARRETT BROWN “SHOULD CHILL JOURNALISTS TO THE BONE”
[Ed.: Maybe someone should write those two fellows an e-mail and inquire about the psy-op nature of national security law.]
“…Brown, 33, a feisty, confrontational figure, published incendiary findings about what private intelligence contractors were doing. His work, still largely ignored by the mainstream media, came before NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden’s revelations made government surveillance a household topic.
His reports based on hacked e-mails were nothing short of astonishing. Working through his virtual research syndicate Project PM, Brown described:
• The mass monitoring of social media networks
• A “cyber-intelligence complex” of breathtaking expanse
• Disinformation operations against Wikileaks and its supporters on behalf of Bank of America
• How analysts can control multiple fake online identities
Dec 16, 2014 by Douglas Lucas
[Bold emphasis by editor, noting with interest the proximity of campaigns undertaken by the security state and its subcontractors on behalf of one of those Wall Street banks we’ve paid to bail out of they can continue to prey]
“… Quinn Norton, a journalist who covers the Anonymous movement, told the court:
“The concept [that] you could be held responsible for [posting] a link is absolutely chilling for what I do. It’s absolutely chilling to what 21st Century journalism will be.”
I can’t understand for the life of me why I would be interested, can you?
“… Norton dated Aaron Swartz for three years. Articles in The Atlantic and in The New Yorker indicate that she was pressured by prosecutors to offer information or testimony that could be used against Swartz, but that she denied having information that supported prosecutors’ claims of criminal intentions on Swartz’s part. Prosecutors nevertheless attempted to use a public blog post on Swartz’s blog that Norton mentioned, which may or may not have been co-authored by Swartz, as proof of a criminal intent. …”
Bill Blunden says that “the likelihood of a positive outcome will depend in part upon people acquiring access to alternative sources of accurate information.”
Bill Blunden, http://cryptome.org/2014/12/sony-wurlitzer.pdf
Julie Levesque, a journalist and researcher with the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG), Montreal, recently listened to a presentation by Jacques Pauwels and reported on fascism and war as tools of the elite elite-tools to crush and kill dissent , i.e., how global war is “about crushing mass revolutionary movements”.
[This link has many quotes from the leaflets, and links to their complete text, as well as much more.]
[There are about 40 videos on YouTube on this topic.]
Yes, it is true that the concept and name of The White Rose Society have been appropriated by people who are actively engaged in attempting to influence your worldview.
It is perhaps the nature of power and hegemony (some might call it parasitism, some might see it as the choking of a python or the obscurantism of the octopus) that it cloaks, absorbs or chokes to death whatever or whomever it is that stands in their way or seeks to point out to others what is going on, who is responsible, and what some of their options might be.
The White Rose phenomenon is but one example of people exercising their right to know and speak.
The samizdat movement in Soviet Russia (met with techniques of torture, psychiatric manipulation, and forced feeding as documented by Vladimir Bukovsky and others) is another. [These techniques are now used by the same folks seeking to overthrow Russia.]
Power will always suppress the urge for liberty and the right to know and speak.